> instead of
Citation needed. People did not stop talking to family, friends and colleagues just because they're able to leverage LLMs.
Citation needed. People did not stop talking to family, friends and colleagues just because they're able to leverage LLMs.
AI psychosis is real.
People who talk to LLMs too much, get used to them sucking up. Real humans feel jarring after that. (Just like people who get used to being in echo chambers, stop wanting to interact outside of those echo chambers.)
After someone has an answer from an LLM, often that replaces reasons we would have talked to others. (See the OP for examples.)
It does fit the personal experiences of a wide variety of people that I've talked to about it. Including therapists who are having to deal with the fallout within families of these dynamics.
If you wait a few years, I'm sure that peer reviewed research will catch up with the current social phenomena. But by then there will be some other fairly new social phenomena where common experience is ahead of the research.
Which people? There are clearly people who did—some with catastrophic, newsworthy results, but presumably more without.