Hacker News Reader

I've been meaning to do a "run 3 times and pick the best" version for quite a while, I should really pull the trigger on that one. Currently it's one-shot only.

View on HN

You could run 3 times and overlay/average the images to show how consistent they are

Best-of-3 would be cheating, ruin the test, middle of 3 makes more sense

Why would you need the 3rd run if you pick the "one in the middle"?

Middle as in not the best, and not the worst. As opposed to the second generated in sequence.

But not the best/not the worst is somewhat subjective.. so not sure how well that would work.

I think GP meant picking the median pelican

Reply on news.ycombinator.com