That's a distinct possibility. Further mathematical research might still allow considerable refinement in describing what a correct fundamental theory does NOT imply.
That's a distinct possibility. Further mathematical research might still allow considerable refinement in describing what a correct fundamental theory does NOT imply.
By and large, scientific progress is cumulative. The cutting edge of quantum theory a few decades back is now undergraduate-level.
Yes, there are probably theoretical limits to human understanding, but the analogy with fish breaks down because fish don't (as far as we know) have cultural accumulation of knowledge.
We may (and in my opinion, definitely will) continue to refine theories of physics in the future but I don't think we will ever achieve perfection. There will always be some minuscule break that will give rise to a new theory.
[UPDATE]: Of course, I have no logical means of proving that except inductive reasoning from history (we haven't come up with a perfect theory yet but we have continued to improve what we have) just as there is no deductive means to prove that a fundamental theory (however complex) does exist.