fair — this post mapped the gaps without making the case for whether filling them changes what an agent can do. the interesting ones are procedural and prospective. both deserve their own post.
thanks for the read.
thanks for the read.
The reason I asked the question is because in the case we don’t need the rest, it would be better to not use this terminology for these systems. We already anthropomorphize LLMs too much and although I get the marketing value of that, it’s not always to the benefit of the people who interact with them.
Please do write the rest of the posts!
yeah i agree with you on not using the terminology, although it's intuitive it's also confusing enough. it's tempting to do that, but i share your sentiment
Seems like teams are encoding procedural knowledge in skills repositories, and I wonder if there’s additional utility from an auto created procedural memory layer