I was trying to be sympathetic and acknowledge virtualenv's potential flaws, actually, even though I haven't personally encountered them, but I guess that was a waste of time.
> This is unrealistic. You seem to have moved to Go as an alternative, but I know because I've seen the complaints that Go doesn't satisfy that standard either.
It's a dig - you completely ignore the valid complaints about Python to instead focus on what you think will provoke me.
The problem (for you) was, from the very start, I bought up the pain points with Go.
> I'm going to blame that on Amazon frankly. That's definitely bizarre.
I'll grant I lost track of the context that you were trying to raise the possibility of some grand encompassing solution to all programming language package management. All I wanted was to reinforce the idea that virtualenv is Often Just Fine in practice, at least if used in sensible ways.
Folks, take a step back, both of you. It's just software.