Hacker News Reader

Comment by arkadiytehgraet | Hacker News Reader

I have explicitly stated more than once, beforehand, what would have given you a benefit of doubt from my perspective. Even after reading all that you opted for answer evasion, rather than providing any substance, as you do with all the questions addressed to you. I do understand why you had to do it here though, because the claims regarding AI and LLM you have made before are even more outlandish than what has been posted over the last 10 days and similarly without a single shred of proof.

View on HN

I find it so funny that claims like this are so outlandish to you that it makes you think I'm a shill:

> Unfortunately, instead they have claimed recently that they went completely full-on with agentic coding skipping reviews and pushing to prod directly at a FAANG, no less.

This is like the most normal thing in my org, lmao. The fact that this aggravates you so much, is proof to me that many people/industries are way behind the curve on agents. Still bullish!

> as someone who is actually using LLMs in their work,

You should consider that your way of using LLMs is not the only correct way, and may in fact be severely limited, unimaginative, and/or close-minded.

Nothing of substance yet again, more unfounded LLM-hype. As a reminder, this whole thread started by other people asking you to provide examples or proofs of your outlandish claims. Instead of doing that you ignore the questions or cover behind NDA (which is bullshit, because 1) no one is asking about the secret sauce, only the end result and 2) most of the work in FAANGs does not require signing NDA, and you would have known it if you actually worked at a FAANG).

Moreover, you refuse to even name the organization you allegedly work at. This is because people who actually work there will immediately call you out on your bullshit, so you have to stay intentionally vague there.

This is just yet another evidence of you being a shill.

lol. lmao, even. Everything is under an NDA unless otherwise stated. It's hilarious to me that you think it's fine for me to give away our competitive advantage on HN.

And give away my org, for what? So some HN loser can doxx me?

Anyways, there's no point. If you learn to use agents, you'll understand eventually. If you don't, well, that's a you problem.

Once again, no proofs of your claims, only more LLM-hype and personal attacks.

No, you are intentionally being obtuse, because people have already called you out on your lies. Saying "my team worked on <X>" is not under NDA in 90%+ cases, and no one is asking you for the implementation details for the <X>.

Name your company so others from it can confirm what you have claimed regarding AI and LLMs or deny it. Each FAANG being 10k+ (and in most cases 50-100k+) makes doxxing you unlikely, as others have done so on this forum without any problem.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com