Hacker News Reader

I think there might be a difference between “I’m violating copyright law to enjoy a work of art” and “I’m violating copyright law on a global, species-wide scale to create a trillion dollar company and enrich myself.” Maybe you can argue the former is wrong but there’s no way it’s equivalent to the latter.

Those books are not free for us, aren't they? This argument would meant one iota sense if the outcome was free information or free access to books.

Instead, overall outcome is more centralization, formerly accessible resources of information hard to find and starved.

> Those books are not free for us, aren't they?

The library card is really cheap tho.

HN isn't a person and "information" doesn't have anything resembling desires

LLM weights deserve to be free

I thought information wanted to be expensive because the right information at the right time can change your life...

haha, thanks for my daily.