Hacker News Reader

Hacker News

Comment by tcfhgj | Hacker News Reader

Parent Full thread

tcfhgj

> Despite the usual complaints it’s alive and well and Rust will not replace it.

to some degree it is already being replaced:

https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj...

source: https://blog.google/security/rust-in-android-move-fast-fix-t...

View on HN

Why does any mention of C++ nowadays turn into a Rust debate? These can coexist even in a single project via C ABI. Also, despite the vast syntax and semantic differences, an experienced dev will be able to apply most of their knowledge from one to the other.

>"Why does any mention of C++ nowadays turn into a Rust debate?"

Because for most developers language is a religion rather than just a tool.

If a tool had been replaced by a better tool, wouldn't it be natural to discuss that?

First - the tool in question had not been replaced. Second -discussion based on merits is one thing. Holy war is something totally different.

Personally I do not consider Rust to be a better tool but it does not matter. Each one is free to drink their own poison. I do not get obsessed about screwdrivers and I have used many.

In many instances the tool has been replaced.

You have written a glib and low effort reply to anything that disagrees with your Rust-maximal worldview. The sheer immaturity of Rust devs is enough to put me off the language.

That's actually a common pattern and to me that's a bit off-putting as well.

I have seen examples where some opinion gets momentum and it's repeated over and over again on the Internet even though the merit is very questionable.

Haven't looked enough into Rust to form an opinion though.

I haven't voiced an opinion, but a fact.

Otherwise, I don't respond to (imo) obvious provocations from questionable motives.

I dont think so.

The problem is the sunk cost fallacy.

You mean there are still people left who do not want to rewrite everything in Rust?

It's because crowing about Rust is like sending dick pics. I suspect it's the same part of the brain responsible with the same neural pathways stimulated.

My fault for mentioning Rust (perhaps I did it because it’s vaguely amusing watching Rust maximalists flex).

Just to add to the bait, I find CPP libraries much more terse and functional, Rust libs tend towards over complexity and feature flexing.

> We adopted Rust for its security and are seeing a 1000x reduction in memory safety vulnerability density compared to Android’s C and C++ code.

This is a pretty poor post. It’s impossible to see what exactly they’re comparing but they seem to be comparing post LLM code to pre LLM code.

Don't distract, please.

Here you can find a general discussion of the article: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45918616

Don’t tell me what to write.

Nevertheless, your feedback, despite its rudeness, backs up my criticism so thanks. Are you a Rust dev?

Reply on news.ycombinator.com