Bluesky is even worse, some of their emails come from "moderation@blueskyweb.xyz".
They have to make posts to assure people it's not a scam, especially as they'll ask you to mail ID etc to that address:
They have to make posts to assure people it's not a scam, especially as they'll ask you to mail ID etc to that address:
I was working in anti-spam at the time, so I was eyeballing a lot of raw email dumps and writing analysis scripts for "anomalous" urls, so it popped up fairly frequently.
https://web.archive.org/web/20000608173453/http://support.mi...
Would you please explain more?
This is the archived version of that link: https://web.archive.org/web/20110204205739/http://www.people...
It’s not a good excuse…
There should be a long list of companies whose policies are worse than theirs.
I can easily see a social media company demanding an ID falling under this definition if the accuser believes that the actual use of said ID will be different or more expansive than implied. That is not an unreasonable assumption, IMO.