Hacker News Reader

I am far lower-value capital for tasks like digging ditches, moving things from point to point and proof reading documents than available non-human capital. Now non-human capital out performs me on many more tasks than a few years ago. I don't like it, but don't find it helpful to deny.

View on HN

I didn't ask if you were lower capital for digging ditches or moving things. I was asking if you were low value for your current job or not. Why shouldn't you be replaced?

It's incredibly easy to make these arguments about how it's good to replace humans until it comes around to you.

It's incredibly easy to presume hypocrisy to avoid engaging with an argument. Yes, I was let go and replaced with nobody, and they now use AI much more heavily. One year ago next week. How does that change the arugment? If that's a hard question it may be easier to presume that I'm lying.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com