Juries are the "finders of fact". That's the phrase often used anyway.
They just can't "found" something when they are not asked. If you tell the count you found something because you saw something outside the court, that would consider invalid.
In its more colloquial sense, I can see why you prefer to call that "answering" questions rather than "finding" facts.
However, it's silly to quibble over the parent thread's author's usage of "found" when it's the dominant phrasing used in the legal system.