Guess what the most wanted christmas present will be...
techcrunch.com
techcrunch.com
Pretty much the biggest innovation of Apple was marketing. Yes the devices are very good but their marketing is something that their competitors always seem to overlook.
Fortunately you can buy iPad's of earlier generations, even the first retina types, for a lot less off of either Apple's own site or even through their e-bay entity.
While I see the value they represent I am all for finding more reasons to keep kids outdoors instead of indoors. I kept my Kindle for reading because of this one issue, it is much better outside than any tablet. If need mail or internet my phone is fine and any serious mail/browsing is best on the computer (iMac fwiw)
I'm on my second iPad and I sold the first one for about 1/2 what I paid for it. I'm not really sore at that since I got to use an iPad 1 for 2 years, then I got an iPad 3. I also get a new laptop roughly every 2 years -- another ticking clock of obsolescence.
I could wait two years, or I could buy and iPad now and another in two years. The difference is I get to use an iPad for the next 2 years while I wait. When I buy something computer related, I don't really expect it to meet my needs for more than 1 or 2 years (except maybe LCD's).
Kids on the other hand are, in general, poorly informed, vulnerable to fads, and have limited disposable incomes. I'm sure a lot of kids barely even know what an iPad is - they just know they want one. And when they get it, and they do what kids generally do with these devices - play games - how are they supposed to know that the iPad sucks for gaming? For a lot of the current generation of kids, the iPad will be an entry point into gaming - it has the cachet that Nintendo had for earlier generations. Kids buy or ask for iPads because then they can show them off at school. But the iPad is such a limited device - the cost for a highly modular OS with an abundant app ecosystem is that there's just not much to get your teeth into with the device. The most interesting thing you can do with the OS is long-press an icon until they all start to wiggle.
I watch my little brother with his $600 iPad. First he's playing Dragonvale - a Farmville clone - for hours. Then he's playing GTA3 - do you know that videogame is 10 years old I ask him? Don't you want to play it with a real controller instead of slidy glass controls on a heavy tablet? Then he plays Chinatown Wars - more slidy glass controls for a ported DS game. Maybe I'm just being cranky and my-generation-was-better-ist. Maybe there's a lot to be said for one device that can do all of these things. Maybe the iPad is great because first kids plays with the games, then they find other cool apps, then suddenly they've set up recording studios at home. I dunno. Anyway as a game-playing device in my opinion the iPad is too limited, and as a useful tablet I think it is very far from a mature ideal of how a tablet could work - and I think tablets will evolve very, very quickly over the next three years, and the iPad will look very outdated soon. So I feel sorry for the kids because I think they could do better for gaming and because their new treasure is about to submerged in a looming surge of innovation.
http://www.cultofmac.com/201944/oprah-gushes-about-her-love-...