It's a good thing then that I'm not concerned about how interesting my perspective is to you.
To try to discuss more productively: I already thought Monet was overrated, and this was a long-held and considered opinion, not just a knee-jerk reaction to this post.
The post seemed to serve as a pepsi-challenge that confirmed what I already thought, but you're right that it's all cherrypicked anyway. That's the part I didn't consider so carefully.
I notice that were doing this underneath these words:
> Hopefully it helps people to at least be more conscious of their bias.
Oh, well. Is this how it feels when it's working?