Experimental New York Times Interface
prototype.nytimes.com
prototype.nytimes.com
Other than the 2-box story at the top-left, having both X and Y axes and same-size boxes makes it difficult to determine what's worth reading and what's not. It would be interesting combine the grid with a Hacker News/Digg-like point system that reordered the stories by popularity.
The fact that you lose access to the Skimmer interface after clicking on a story seems weird, but that's fixable.
Still, I like that they're trying new ideas. And I love having a small photo with each headline.
Thinking about it this is one of the top selling points to me of this design. I don't CARE what the editors think is an important story, show me the article summaries and I'LL decide what I want to read about. This system is great because I can quickly scan the stories for those topics I'm interested in (Science, Tech, Business, Politics) and never have to look at sport or fashion or Britney's new tongue piercing etc
But either way, as you say, nice that they're trying out new ideas
Any idea where to access that mode from the traditional NYT frontpage?
http://firstlook.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/02/13/sunday-browsin...
I like the physical newspaper for the editorial value it provides: it places emphasis on certain stories (by making them larger and more accessible) and demotes others. This is real value, that I am willing to pay for.
The new interface makes almost every story identical.
Now, on the internet we have plenty of news feeds, and very few entities who can actually provide that editorial value. So I just can't understand why The New York Times would want to get rid of its biggest competitive advantage?
The news that has been coming out of the newspaper industry recently is mostly comprised of how their model isn't being as profitable as it used to be and their struggle to stay afloat. I actually applaud the NYT for the experiments they've been playing with. The interactive info-graphics, their openness, and little apps like this Skimmer really do set them apart.
I doubt they just invented this and ran with it. I think they're just coming out with new tools and techniques and just seeing what sticks. I don't see anything wrong with that.
* Graceful degradation for noscript; maybe do a simple CSS fallback option.
* The page-slide animation is eye-candy but IMHO with time it might get annoying, make it optional.
* It shouldn't be hard to add an X on top-right corner of boxes to remove or shade things you read already.
* Some killer fonts, it's the New York Times!The page is utterly useless without JS. I keep JS turned off. It's a good thing I read here about the animation eye candy before trying to turn it on to explore the NYT page. Side-to-side movement on a screen gives me brain seizures. If NYT sticks with this new plan, that will be yet one more site that's off limits to me.
If I want movement and eye candy with my news, I can turn on the TV.
I can't imagine it'd be too hard to include server-side fonts akin to stylesheets in the HTML header of sites. Ok, the major obstacles are:
1) Browsers need to support the functionality
2) Operating system-specific font rendering
Wouldn't this really open up the possibilities for web designers?Anybody know of serious usability testing of these grid layouts? I'd be interested to know if I'm just unusual in finding it easier to read down than across.
I would prefer they made a simple list like here on hn instead. Is there some general news site with a simple list of news on the web?
Hold 's' to see section numbers. Hold 'a' to see story numbers.
So to see section 4 (US) just type: 14s Once you're there, to see story 71 once you're there, just type: 71a
Yeah, like HN, really.