Hacker News Reader

> But the real danger with these IMO is that they're turning casual conversations into a permanent record, and one that will be completely discoverable in court, should the company get into trouble later.

I would add that their is no guarantee their are correct as well.

View on HN

You’d use a computer generated transcript as a guide, not as proof - the proof is the recording of the person actually saying the thing, not the LLMs best guess of what it imagined the person saying.

“At timestamp X, person Y said Z” says the robot, and then you dutifully scrub the audio to timestamp X to verify.

Is audio always kept in addition to transcripts? (genuine question, I rarely record either)

At least in Microsoft Teams transcription and recording are separate options.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com