If this is what you meant, then it sounds like an argument against free trade, if it means you keep ending up with the short stick.
Yeah but everyone has an equal right to vote. If they don;'t benefit, why would they agree to get screwed for the "net benefit" of others?
Whether that happens in real life is a different question.
Does that money go directly into my pocket so I can afford the more expensive energy? Or does it go into the pocket of private energy companies?
Because I feel like there's some faults with this "free market", which is mostly just socializing losses and privatizing profits.
But for the end user, whether you're being ripped off by a local or a foreign energy oligarch, it doesn't really matter, people just want to pay less.
We’re right in the middle of the transition with maximum volatility swinging between extremely cheap renewables and expensive fossil plants.