And do we really care what a developer is, be it age, previous non-tech job experience, or any other metric? It almost seems like an Internet meme at this point.
And do we really care what a developer is, be it age, previous non-tech job experience, or any other metric? It almost seems like an Internet meme at this point.
And those kids ... inexperienced, no mortgage, no creditors, no "real world" responsibilities ... absolutely see it.
When someone builds something using the tools at hand and the experience they have, it definitely matters as to how old they are, and how much they've done. That shapes how you give feedback, both in style and content.
I know a lot of bright, intelligent, keen, motivated kids, and in every way I encourage them to go and build things that they think are relevant and important, even if I don't agree. The experience will shape them and make them better.
> it definitely matters as to how old they are, and how much they've done.
No, it doesn't. Either the tool is good/useful or it isn't. Everything about this tool is AI slop, from the website to the utility itself.
And I've worked with many youngsters who have significant amounts of empathy. They feel the pain almost as if it's their own.
>> definitely matters as to how old they are, and how much they've done.
> No, it doesn't. Either the tool is good/useful or it isn't.
So if a developer with decades of experience in writing software would receive exactly the same feedback from you as a 16-year-old writing their first project?
If not, if you would tailor your feedback, then it does matter how old they are.