> 'Very few people were opting in to end-to-end encrypted messaging in DMs,' Meta says.
Then why didn't you make the opt-in default like Signal and WhatsApp? :-)
Then why didn't you make the opt-in default like Signal and WhatsApp? :-)
1. An E2E system where the provider has de facto access to the encrypted data, or
2. You shift key management to the users and let them risk data loss.
Either way:
a. The provider can release an app version at any time that accesses the data on the client side, and
b. Most of your users cannot differentiate between E2EE and SSL/TLS, nor are they interested in doing so, nor they care about it.
a shame that they now have to shut it off because people didn't use something they didn't know existed /s