Hacker News Reader

Comment by jabedude | Hacker News Reader

Where is a source for either of these extraordinary claims?

https://x.com/jarredsumner/status/2048434628248359284

The gp's interpretation of that tweet is such a completely incorrect reading as to make one think it's likely disingenuous.

> I expect OSS to go the opposite direction: no human contribution allowed.

How is it an incorrect interpretation? Jared is indeed pitching/suggesting/predicting that human contribution will not be allowed in the near future, i.e. banned.

A prediction is not a policy.

When you use the word “allowed” it becomes a policy.

No, it doesn't.

What would be required for you to see it as a policy?

"Pitching" generally means that the person making the pitch is endorsing and pushing for it. (This might also be a regional word meaning/usage difference type thing.)

The person upthread should have said "predicting".

Wow, didn't realize how bad the situation was. Completely lost any respect and trust I had in the Bun project and its lead dev.

What a weird take. I do a ton of OSS, and the act of writing code is what makes it fun for me. If I were forced to use an LLM to write all my OSS code, I would just not do it anymore.

he clearly works for an LLM provider now

Jesus christ, This is the thing which should be talked about more. What an abysmally bad take. This actually makes me worry about the faith of bun more than any other thing discussed here.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com