Hacker News Reader

Comment by dlubarov | Hacker News Reader

The headline seems pretty dishonest. It seems like what he actually said was along the lines of "if someone isn't aligned with our values, they might decide that working here isn't a good fit."

There's no transcript though, mostly paraphrasing from an outlet whose almost sole focus is smearing Israel, so it's hard to know what was actually said.

View on HN

Here you go: https://therealnews.com/politico-demands-allegiance-to-israe...

TRNN is another outlet with an explicit anti-Zionist stance, and they seem to be just summarizing this Jewish Insider article [1] while adding some anti-Israel spin.

Considering the extra details in the Jewish Insider article, what he said was basically "if someone rejects the Jewish peoples' right to self-determination and rejects Israel's existence, then we have a fundamental difference in values, and they might decide that working here isn't a good fit".

That's pretty far from the MEE's dishonest summary of "support Israel or resign", or TRNN's dishonest summary of "demands allegiance to Israel". One can criticize a government without rejecting the country's very existence. Israelis themselves do it all the time.

[1] https://jewishinsider.com/2026/04/politicos-owner-axel-sprin...

Yes, that is a better article. It spells out Döpfner's position a lot better than the others. The important bit of information is that this is all in response to Politico journalists issuing a joint letter saying that Döpfner using the platform to further his own political agenda will weaken their reputation as an impartial news source.

Instead, he pushed back hard.

So basically: Get on board or get out.

Except a country that is founded on bringing in a new group of people from other places to destroy another and replace them shouldn't exist, especially when it has to keep the people that were already there in whats essentially camps without rights.

Anyone supporting the "existence" of that is a clown.

> along the lines of "if someone isn't aligned with our values, they might decide that working here isn't a good fit."

constructive dismissal

How is people from europe moving to destroy one society and replace it a value? Is home invasion a value too?

Smearing Israel is not needed, they do that to themself.

Murdering, raping and torturing thousands of babies, children, women, man and journalists.

If Israel "smears itself" by being super evil, then why do we constantly see its critics resorting to disinformation? Shouldn't there be plenty to criticize while sticking to the facts?

But you don't. You see one group that justifies people moving from europe to rob pillage rape and kill the natives to make a new state for themselves, and the people that were already there just defending themselves from this.

Why is it that when someone points out anti-Israel disinformation, the topic suddenly changes to some other anti-Israel talking point? If Israel and its supporters are super evil, shouldn’t its critics be able to pick a point (such as the headline claim here) and defend it as truthful, rather than repeatedly shifting as we see here?

Reply on news.ycombinator.com