I read that their reasoning is it exists to block users that use known scraper extensions which bypass their terms of use. But don’t entirely buy that.
I read that their reasoning is it exists to block users that use known scraper extensions which bypass their terms of use. But don’t entirely buy that.
Agreed 100%.
404 catches JS calls in JS proxies and returns mocked-up values (assigned by a profile), it also has protections against TLS fingerprinting, canvas fingerprinting, device enumeration, TCP/IP fingerprinting, HTTP header fingerprinting, and more.
The predatory practices that browser fingerprinting have enabled guised behind "fraud protection" are atrocious. Even with a VPN, even in incognito mode, a website can track me and see what I've been doing EVEN IF ITS NOT ON THEIR SITE.
Then a data broker buys all this data and uses an AI model to put it all into a pretty little package and sell it to Google, or the gov't, or something. It's scary.
The browser needing access and a random website having access are quite different. Seems like a big ol' pile of vulns waiting to happen.