You have no way of knowing this.
> your arguments are poor
You've yet to refute any of my arguments, focusing only on optics.
> your tone hostile
I call it like I see it, in good faith. If you're offended, feel free to engage on the substance. Or you can make any real changes on your end contingent on meaningless tone changes on mine, but that would put you in the same basket as Friedersdorf, Thomas, et al: unwilling to engage in conversation and good faith debate.
> It was very recently that Bill Clinton was signing in "welfare reform" and the Defence [sic] of Marriage Act, and minorities were told to shut up
That was over 30 years ago. Remember that one time we elected the first Black president, ran the first woman candidate for president, elected the first Black woman vice-president? Remember that one time we put the first Black woman on the bench? Remember that one time we got marriage rights for the LGBTQ community? Remember that one time we pushed for years to decriminalize and legalize cannabis and spare thousands and thousands of Black men meaningless prison sentences? Remember when we pushed through sentencing reform? Remember all our efforts to reform the immigration and asylum systems? Etc. etc. etc. If this is your summation of the benefits Democrats have had on minority populations since and including the Clinton era you are woefully ignorant.
> Nah, dude. Politics is lifestyle brand to you, and online toxicity is your form of cathartic self-expression.
Of the two of us, only you have resorted to personal attacks. Every accusation is a confession.