"Absurd fiction" aka "established law for decades." This concept of "serialized part" is a construct stemming from Democrat-established legislation.
What part of "shall not be infringed" is difficult to understand?
What part of "shall not be infringed" is difficult to understand?
'A well balanced breakfast being necessary to the start of a healthy day, the right of the people to keep and eat food shall not be infringed.'
Whose rights shall not be infringed here, the breakfast's or those of the people?
Who has the right to keep and use toasters? The people, or the well-balanced breakfast?
The word "regulated", which has no semantic overlap with the modern meaning of the same word.
If one wants to make something illegal, the onus is on the lawmaker to write precise legislation. This is centuries-old legal doctrine.