It'll defend both sides (mutually contradictory) to the death. NOTHING will budge it from its initial stance.
It'll defend both sides (mutually contradictory) to the death. NOTHING will budge it from its initial stance.
Some people do well on 6 small meals, others do well on no breakfast and two large ones. Studies can't tell you anything useful about that, you have to experiment and find out what works best for you
But in terms of physiology the answer is quite clear:
1. The protein is the most important macro to get, no matter if bulking or cutting. It is the building block.
2. Whatever the amounts (0.8g-1.8g/kg of bodyweight, depends a bit on a situation and the willingness to lose some potential marginal gains), try to divide your daily protein somewhat evenly between meals.
3. Pareto principle, you get the most benefits by having 3 meals. 4 if you really care about small differences and want to optimize. 5 meals give negligible additional benefits, for professional athletes who want to be anal.
4. So basically eat at least 3 meals and up to whatever works for you practically speaking.
It's not that difficult or ambiguous.
So yes eat 2g/kg protein but the best way to time that in terms of meals, best specific foods to eat etc is definitely influenced by your genes
But physiologically speaking there is no difference in the optimal recommendation in terms of protein synthesis: protein should be evenly divided between evenly spaced meals.
If people decide that this non-optimal way of life fits them better, then go for it. But let's stop with the "I feel better this way, therefore biologically my body works differently than any other human body." BS.