Whether a country massacres its own people is not really a good litmus test since there are countries that treat its own citizens well but foreigners really badly. One such country is… oh the US!
Who cares if a country installs a panopticon to monitor their citizens and runs them over with tanks, look at this other thing over here.
Suppose country A kills 1000 people and country B kills 1000000 people and people are criticizing country A for murder while calling country B a better alternative. What is relevant here?
Did I miss the uprising?
Also, nice try propagandizing chained deportation as “free plane tickets”
This doesn’t even touch the Guatemalan genocide, US backing of the Rwandan genocide perpetrators, the white terror, Pinochet, the Khmer Rouge, Afghanistan, or Israel.
Why are you changing the subject?
1) conquers places, e.g. Hong Kong, Tibet, Xinjang, ...
2) kills, "disappears", ... the people there https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zbSypV2ixjE
3) China's CCP has been pushing out immigrants, and fostering racist sentiment
> Hong Kong
Did India conquer itself when the British returned rule of India to Indians?
> China's CCP has been pushing out immigrants, and fostering racist sentiment
It's a little more complicated than this. I think the level of racism at both the state and individual levels is similar between China and western countries, although it may manifest in different ways.
I hate historical claims. There are disputed territories less than 10km from where I live, and if at all possible, I'd like there not to be a war here. I doubt there's many places where that's not the case. I know there's some, but not many.