Hacker News Reader

Comment by prmoustache | Hacker News Reader

> Neukgu is part of a programme at O-World to restore the Korean wolf, which once roamed the Korean Peninsula but is now considered extinct in the wild.

I don't understand, shouldn't they have let him go if the idea is that they still roam in the wild? Why forcing it back to a zoo?

View on HN

Pretty sure if you let only a handful of individuals from an almost-extinct species roam around freely in an uncontrolled environment, chances are pretty high something is going to kill them off before they reproduce, hence why they are almost-extinct.

The zoo provides a controlled environment needed to restore the species.

EDIT: typo/word ordering

Also, careful breeding to retain as much genetic diversity as possible is important to avoid collapse in small populations. Even if small local pockets survive, if each pocket is only able to inbreed with itself that will cause problems.

Our local children's museum is part of a network of sites working to restore red wolf [1] populations. Every few years they get new wolves as the coordinators move young wolves around to optimize mating pairs.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_wolf

They live in a pretty big conservatory (korean link but you can see the pictures)

https://m.wikitree.co.kr/articles/1132213

India is trying to increase it's wild tiger population, but that doesn't mean you let tigers roam around in the middle of New Delhi.

Maybe it’s because wolves are genetically dogs and will cross breed and the conservation program supposedly needs to increase the numbers of that particular breed and not just wolves/dogs in general?

Reply on news.ycombinator.com