Is my understanding of carbon dating needing an update or the precision to distinguish 100y difference on a 1.2k to 1.3k years base not enough?
If 100y is the difference it could just be that the tree grew for 100y and the at the end they used it?
If 100y is the difference it could just be that the tree grew for 100y and the at the end they used it?
Tree ring databases are pretty good. I think they cross calibrate to radio carbon maybe.