Hacker News Reader

Comment by nacozarina | Hacker News Reader

a person can have full faith in the potential value of ai science and simultaneously have zero faith in the current crop of business stewards of that science.

no one is questioning the underlying model mathematics, they are questioning deceptive & reckless stewards.

View on HN

I think most people oustide the area do not care and do not know about who's on top, and the negative perception is much more related to how the tech will enable users to misuse it (replacing phone lines/support, AI art, things losing quality, etc) than about the companies themselves.

I think there is a lot of truth to what you say, particularly when it comes to caring rather than parroting; however as part of my personal and civil life I interact with a lot of non-tech people in non-tech capacities, and a surprising number of them raise unprompted complaints about people like Sam Altman and Elon Musk. Musk I understand everyone knowing about; between Tesla, SpaceX, the Thai boys football team, a very public inclination to raise his hand, and a position in the US government he is meaningfully famous. However how Sam Altman has managed to get his name out there in the wrong way very quickly to a bunch of Brits I don't know.

Yes I believe we're quickly approaching crypto territory, where distributed ledgers certainly have their valuable use cases, but the overwhelming _mindshare_ is active scamming and/or monkey jpegs.

There needs to be a concerted focus on real value for end users and less "yeah the terminator will take your job and raise your kids in your absence"

It is clear AI has value in the pursuit further knowledge.

It is also clear AI will bring even worse poverty levels and skew the wealth disparity even further.

The latter isn't the fault of AI itself, its the fault of the humans who will control it.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com