> all recognize that they're conditional - if you cross certain lines of conduct you lose them - and there's actually a lot of debate to be had about where those lines are

One hundred percent of those debates end at process, not unilateral action. If it can be unilaterally nullified, it is no longer a right.

> you have to believe in them 100% or 0%

Not degree but range. We don’t have a right to infinite life or medicine. But everyone has to have the same level of right for it to be a right. Otherwise I can disagree with your right to a right and nullify it on my own terms.