I think there’s a fundamental difference between those two cases. Python was envisioned as a
programming language that is easy to teach; APL was envisioned as a
language that aids in teaching, not as a
programming language (reading
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/APL_(programming_language), APL was started in 1957, with the first work on implementing it as a computer language only starting in 1962)
Lisp is similar to APL in that sense. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lisp_(programming_language)#Hi...:
“Steve Russell said, look, why don't I program this eval… and I said to him, ho, ho, you're confusing theory with practice, this eval is intended for reading, not for computing. But he went ahead and did it. That is, he compiled the eval in my paper into IBM 704 machine code, fixing bugs, and then advertised this as a Lisp interpreter, which it certainly was. So at that point Lisp had essentially the form that it has today”