It looks like AI generated code can't be used legally - without respecting rights and licenses or without proving that no copyrighted code may happen to be mixed in - true only if no such was used to learn at first - what all we know, it's not the case: all is tainted by legal omissions or simply: stolen (prove otherwise - there is nothing AI invented first except hallucinations).
AI generated works can't be copyrighted as for now - but original works eaten by AI shall not be decopyrighted neither !
Then, just by preserving all attributions of pieces mixed into the answers it would be possible to distinguish what was hallucinated and slope, what was not - and what was stolen, what was not - and who is responsible for what (?)
- inconvenient ?? - to expensive ??? - Duh.
If no more AI slopes and no rights be broken - it's worth it,
- without that ? - it will be distrusted, illegal and terminal.