BlueSky and Mastodon are much smaller than Twitter/X, and they're staying on the platforms, so this is a moot point.
This makes absolutely no sense because EFF is staying on those platforms, so this point is also moot.
It's almost like there's an ulterior motive at play...
If you actually read the article you would see the entire section they dedicated to addressing exactly this complaint. But then you wouldn't be able to whine about it here in good faith, would you?
If you actually understood the section in question you would see it doesn't explain in any coherent manner why they're sticking with Facebook but not Twitter. But if you understood it then you wouldn't be able to whine about it here in good faith, would you?
In any case, my point was more about the silly idea that it's imperative for any organization to be on the 8th-largest US site.