There's a buttload of data against creationism. There are living trees older than the typical date given for the creation.
Not that I think the age estimates folks have has much basis is reality. But this is a particularly empty nothing-burger.
I’m sure you’ll say the older ones are wrong, of course.
Why do these disagree? Are the metrics perhaps under some debate, even amongst the Scientists?
Me too!
There are mountains (both literal and metaphorical) of evidence for an old earth. The only evidence for a young earth is a book which contradicts its own creation story in the first two chapters.