People had been hunting whales for centuries, but industrialisation gave them the means and the motivation to do so until near extinction.
Obviously we’re becoming better at extracting resources over time, but humans ran out of new land to exploit long before Europe's conquest of the Americas. Land only seemed empty because disease decimated native populations, people lived in San Francisco thousands of years ago.
I doubt that anyone reading this can’t get the point of the analogy.
The value is in showing where the analogy fails, and either disproves the point, or deepens the point.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Industrial_Revolution
I get sort of wishy-washy from 1830 on, because lots of people put the end of the Industrial revolution as being 1900, but 1840 is a defensible and commonly held position.
In Britain. Moby Dick ain't set in Britain.