Hacker News Reader

Their current policy of no AI bots is fine. No need to improve it, you can't.

The current policy is not "no AI Bots": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Bot_policy. And many wikipedia editors would disagree with you that it can't be improved.

> The use of LLMs to generate or rewrite article content is prohibited

I'm not a wikipedia editor, but I assume this applies to bots as well

> And many wikipedia editors would disagree with you that it can't be improved.

There are many people who think many things that are wrong. That doesn't make them right.

You clearly have no understanding of the principle of consent.

If you don't want to destroy Wikipedia, why are you acting like this?

I'm suspect that many of his responses here are written by AI.

How would using a bullshit generator trained on Wikipedia improve it in any way?