> if one wants to stick with the official kernel without out-of-tree modules
I wonder how could a requirement like that possibly arise. Especially with an obvious exception for zfs.
I wonder how could a requirement like that possibly arise. Especially with an obvious exception for zfs.
Also out of tree.
Just talking about filesystems with checksumming (and multidevice). Any new filesystem to support these features is going to be newer.
I've had both btrfs and bcachefs multidevice filesystems lock up read-only on me. So no real data loss, just a pain to get the data into a new file system, the time it was an 8 drive array on btrfs.