You think.
Peaceful transfers of power are always tricky in younger democracies.
You think.
Peaceful transfers of power are always tricky in younger democracies.
Trump is already well beyond the confines of the Constitution. If the 2A crowd gave a fuck about rights other than larping soldiers, they would have already marched on him. He has openly declared that guns should be taken away from people and that having a gun on you at a protest should justify shooting you. The 2A crowd continues to support him fully.
OK, I'm calling you on this one. Source please.
https://www.c-span.org/clip/white-house-event/user-clip-dona...
Here's about the second claim
https://time.com/7358403/nra-trump-clash-gun-carrying-rights...
"He shouldn't have been carrying a gun" says Trump about someone fully in compliance with US law, who never even drew his weapon. "You can't walk in with guns". It's up to you to look up discussions about Kyle Rittenhouse and what republicans and Trump supporters believed about bringing a gun to a protest not very long ago.
Elected twice by the "(2A rights) SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED" crowd. You can bet they will continue to support him.
This is trivially debunked.
The word younger is implying to me that US would be considered the youngest in a list of current democracies, which I wasn't aware of.