Ironic. Even more so since it seems like in general LLM output doesn't seem to be proteced by copyright in the first place. And since Claude code is entirely written by Claude code, it shouldn't be proteced as well.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monkey_selfie_copyright_disput...
> Copyright does not extend to purely AI-generated material, or material where there is insufficient human control over the expressive elements.
> Whether human contributions to AI-generated outputs are sufficient to constitute authorship must be analyzed on a case-by-case basis.
PDF https://www.copyright.gov/ai/Copyright-and-Artificial-Intell...