This sounds like FUD to get people to abandon one of our strongest cognitive enhancing toolsof all time
AI's existence is like the mental equivalent of a heavy weighted barbell that also happens to be edible and tastes delicious. You could use it in a way to get in great shape, you could also use it in a way where you get type 2 diabetes.
It is up to you and your own experiences to decide how that is likely to go for most people.
I mean, you could read the papers themselves, they aren’t inimical to your position by nature.
For example, one of the more salient results is that the more confident you are in AI, the less likely you are to check the output.
When a new invention arrives on the scene, its properties need to be mapped.
Step 1) read the article
Step 2) have a frontier AI model summarize the article
Step 3) find any 'bullshit' that it comes up with
Step 4) do it 5 more times in a row because obviously the non-determinism will make it say something different each time and it should bs you at least once since it's simply a bs machine anyways
Step 5) report your findings