Is there a reason why you cut off the second part of that first sentence when you quoted it? Or was it again because you wanted to argue against a point in your head instead of the one I actually made? Because I'm sure even you can name militaries that generally don't shoot at ambulances, or if they do the people responsible tend to go on trial and be prosecuted.

>>There are countries that never let off suspected criminals due to insufficient evidence?

Funny how Israel always finds insufficient evidence against all of its soldiers.But maybe that just doesn't bother you.

>>what happened to the Gazans who paraded their rape victims around the streets?

Oh wait, it's Gazans now? not Hamas? Or are they one and the same for you?

>>Sanctions can't convince a nuclear state to ignore the attacks against it and give up on its own defense

Of course they can't, and no one advocates anything of that sort. We do want Israel to stop killing Palestinian civialians in the numbers that they do. We want food and medical supplies to be restored. No one says Israel shouldn't defend itself - but this has crossed the line of defence long time ago. Maybe it hasn't for you, but that's your morality that you have to live with.

>> the focus should be on its neighbors who keep attacking it.

You do realize that both of these things can happen, right. We should be criticizing Israel for how it's leading this war, and we should focus on it's neighbours to stop the terrorists inside them. Do you feel Israel is being unfairly treated in this case?