You're only thinking that because we're mostly still at the imperative, REPL stage.
We're telling them what to do in a loop. Instead we should be declaring what we want to be true.
We're telling them what to do in a loop. Instead we should be declaring what we want to be true.
You can certainly write in imperative or functional but you are still telling the computer what you want. LLM use impercise language can generate loose binding the actual reality people one. They have there use cases too but they have a radically different locus of control. Compilers don't ask you to give up percision either they will do what you tell them to do. AI can do whatever it thinks is the most likely next token which is foundationally different from what we do when we engage in programming or writing in general