This post was written by AI, there are multiple clues.
Author, why can you not use your own words?
I am not sure what you meant to say, vs what is LLM garbage I could have prompted myself.
Author, why can you not use your own words?
I am not sure what you meant to say, vs what is LLM garbage I could have prompted myself.
Which makes is even more annoying. Because you don't know which are the good bits where somebody is sharing his unique insight, and which is just taken from the LLMs world knowledge.
Why not accept that it is good, and forget about it being LLM?
> Because you don't know which are the good bits where somebody is sharing his unique insight, and which is just taken from the LLMs world knowledge.
The text probably have been based entirely on the internal notes and investigations and is very informative. Would it be better if the OP wrote it entirely by themselves? Not necessarily.
> New users were signing up but not doing anything, they weren’t creating an org, a project, or a deployment, they just left an account sitting there.
Surely the LLM version is:
> New users were signing up but not doing anything; they weren't creating an org, a project, or a deployment—they just left an account sitting there.
/s