Forecasting the Economic Effects of AI
forecastingresearch.substack.com
forecastingresearch.substack.com
Displaced knowledge workers aren't going to restart American manufacturing. The skillset is different. The relocation burdens are immense. So, this idea of mobile workforce and re-engagement, it's depression-era thinking. I don't think we'll see that, I think we'll see Detroit, but kinda worse. Maybe more like rustbelt: people in place, stuck in over valued unsellable homes, subsisting into disease.
A 10% drop in employment across the knowledge sector won't be met by a 10% rise in vacancy rates for knowledge sector workers.
And, given the drop in salaries, and the drop in consumption, Who exactly do the economists think will be buying those goods and services? If you don't pay people how do they buy things?
So I get the aggregates, but I ask: how are the aggregates being formed?
Link to PDF: https://forecastingresearch.org/s/forecasting-the-economic-e...
Link to Tool: https://explore.forecastingresearch.org/participate/eeai -
There will be no way of proving AGI is a thing or not with a machine capable of generating any text. But also it will make it seems it is unpredictable and uncontrollable and they will sell this as a pain of growth and they had not ways to know that this "conscious-like" machine would be able to do this.
This humanisation campaign lead by Huang and others is the perfect excuse for technology laymen law man who will take for granted that a ML "neuron" is exactly a biological neuron, and that machines take decisions and actions based on will and not pure statistical computing.