"Japanese soldier who kept fighting 29 years after World War 2"
Of course, this is not completely guaranteed safety - but safety has certainly mattered.
Yes, this what Stroustrup said and it makes me laugh. IIRC he phrased with a more of a 'we had safety before Rust' attitude. It also misses the point, safety shouldn't be opt-in or require memorising a rulebook. If safety is that easy in C++ why is everyone still sticking their hand in the shredder?
As for the Core Guidelines - most of them are not about safety; and - they are not to be memorized, but a resource to consult when relevant, and something to base static analysis on.