[flagged]
Which is today, I think we're past the point of "One social media to rule them all."
There's room for multiples, all serving important purposes. Maybe an ideal LinkedIn (work stuff), an ideal Facebook (people you know), Twitter (big public convos) -- and importantly but perhaps nonexistent, a healthy anonymous or pseudonymous space as well.
Do you have examples of such occasions when the linkedin post was actually the cause?
Amusingly, this was someone high up in HR.
I consider them all good because ultimately if you get upset by the way I behave then that's probably going to be true if we work together also.
Sometimes people like to tell me that I'm very authentic and it's clear that I'm not trying to suck up to anyone, which they respect. Some people quietly retreat from me and I find out later that it's because I hurt their feelings inadvertently by shitting on AI or calling out web development as largely being inefficient in resources or something.
No, people do not care. You're not a celeb. This is textbook spotlight effect.
Your life becomes a lot more enjoyable if you don't take yourself so serious, try it sometime
So to this you wish to add the increased risk of negative exposure by saying a bad thing? Or that someone, someones, or people five years from today consider a bad thing?
I love writing and posting and engaging (you can tell from my history here alone), but I'm not crazy enough to risk spilling my feelings on a site full of people in suits and ties, with Leader next to their names.