Hacker News Reader

Comment by wongarsu | Hacker News Reader

Our Mars robots are awesome, but they take years to accomplish what astronauts could do in days. Our latest and greatest model (Perseverance) has traveled 40km (25mi) in 5 years, with the support of a scout helicopter. Which is more than what Curiosity managed in 13 years. But that's approximately what they did in Apollo 17 in five hours. Granted, Apollo 17 didn't make quite as many stops to analyze rocks, but it should give you an idea of the speed difference between our Mars robots and humans. Even just a tiny temporarily occupied Mars science outpost would be a tremendous boost to our understanding of the planet

View on HN

Those robots were designed 20 years ago... You can send now a whole swarm of humanoid robots, that would recharge 24x7 out of a KRUSTY Reactor [1], you did not even had LLMs then.

[1] - https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20205009350/downloads/03...

No, we really can't send something like that now. Or at least not if we want it to be useful on arrival.

I'll make an educated guess that, as of this moment, there are zero functioning swarms of humanoid robots recharging on such a reactor on Earth.

Once we add radiation shielding, software and hardware reliability, landing (marsing?) it all safely and deploying it (among others) I wouldn't be surprised if the earliest arrival time is, unsurprisingly, 20 years in the future.

why would a humanoid robot be preferable to one designed for the specific tasks at hand?

maybe humanoids because tools already designed for human likes? if you send specialised robot it cannot use wrench or climb a ladder... you have to redesign everything

There are currently no wrenches or ladders on mars.

>> Our Mars robots are awesome, but they take years to accomplish what astronauts could do in days.

What? The unmanned space program has been beyond the edges of our solar system. Meanwhile humans have been day tourists in space. I don't know how you can come to this conclusion that "humans > robots" when humans have never even been close to the surface of Mars.

>> Even just a tiny temporarily occupied Mars science outpost would be a tremendous boost to our understanding of the planet

How many robots could we land with the equivalent resources, or telescope satellites, or autonomous probes?

Reply on news.ycombinator.com