Why do you expect a potential userbase to care to read something you didn't even care to write?
Seems a bit disrespectful to me.
Why do you expect a potential userbase to care to read something you didn't even care to write?
Seems a bit disrespectful to me.
The question is: "Should I spend my time engaging with this project?"
The AI-forward presentation says: "Absolutely not."
2. There's a difference between technical documentation, which AI can be quite decent at, and product marketing. A README is usually about 20/80, maybe 50/50 for large FOSS projects. You can have the AI write the sections on how to install the thing for all I care, but as soon as AI is telling me why I should use it, you've lost me. Signals a complete lack of interest in your own product.
But I can imagine that medium-sized companies will want to use AI as a backend in the future, without wanting to be dependent on Antropic.
After all, there are already quite a few companies using OpenClaw.
A self-hosted OpenClaw instance (or other solutions in the future) with Relay would be a good alternative to Claude Cowork.