Hacker News Reader

Am I an untrained human if I believe that Claude Opus 4.6 produces generally better code than I do in most circumstances?

Even with years as a principal engineer at a company with high coding standards and engineering processes?

Maybe not untrained, but you work on some easy, boring shit. That may be true for a lot of developers, I don't know.

What do you reckon? Do you think that is true for me and thousands of others, or that your opinion on this is too narrow and rigid?