I like that the name can be a pun, "Updated-itis: a disease where the afflicted person cannot help but check hourly whether all of their software is up-to-date"
I like that... it was originally a play on yodas strange little syntax.
Of course, anyone that knows what the suffix "-itis" is for will be cringing. It always has bugged me when people use "-itis"-- your [insert thing here] is not inflamed ;)
Ruby programmers who use Bundler can get this for their gems with `bundle outdated`. It's not push notification, but it's much more comprehensive.
I thought of making a similar service, but with the option to upload a package manager config file. scenario: I have project A and B, with some dependencies. I upload the files, and I get a weekly digest "project A: updates for django, userena, taggit, jquery, zurb foundation. project B: django, zurb foundation" or similar. Have you thought of implementing it?
I have almost finished the ability to add custom projects (within reason). Perhaps I could then implement a service which auto-detects packages. So, user Bob creates a repo in github. He adds a file in the root called packages.json which contains a list of the packages he is using. He then adds his repo to updateditis.com. Updateditis periodically checks his packages.json file and if it detects a change in one of the packages versions, it emails Bob saying "For project XYZ, the package ABC has been updated to version 1.2.3, you should consider updating it."
why would I need to add a repo in a scm provider of your choice? let me just upload a requirements file.
Well that should be possible too. However if you add a package later, it would be easier to edit your own package file then to log back in to updateditis and re-upload a package file. Automatic for the people
yes, but IMO it should be provided as a feature, not as a requirement. I'm probably in the minority here, but I prefer general solutions to 'github extensions', as when you host projects elswhere all those useful tools become simply worthless. especially that using a package manager and using github isn't necessarily tied together.
Support-status would be a more useful indicator than is-latest. Of course you can't scrape it, but you could crowd-source it.
Have you tried versioneye.com?
I just did. It's useless for Python; requirements.txt isn't what PyPI uses.
Which kind of support do you would wish for Python?
Cool idea, similar to what I had in mind using Git's tagging system when I built http://hubnotify.com. Are you using any repo or is the version just in a local database?
Nice site!
Currently tracking the version in a local database and checking for changes hourly via cron. I've half implemented checking github repo's but its not 100% accurate yet. Not sure how you are doing it but I am going to focus on an update being any change to a branch. So its basically tracking branches only.
Looks pretty fancy, any plans for an API / auto upgrade system that you could have sitting server side?
Whenever I see something like this I think "Damn, I hope they do a white-label version"
No plans for an api as such yet. Although I might add in the ability to change the notification type. Options would be a push url, sms, jabber notification and anything else that might be useful.
I think non email based notification, or customizable notification, would be a killer.
Congratulations. Awesome idea and a great implementation.