Hacker News Reader

I think you should focus on the claims in this article. There are plenty of principles espoused within.

Smearing his character without directly addressing those just stinks the place up.

There's throwing mud and then there's pointing out the mud already flung all over the walls

And yet, the figures are the figures.

I don't trust anonymous online mudslingers when I've seen the salaries of some of the midlevel AI roles. It all stinks.

Worse yet: this person points to one article he disfavours and uses that as sufficient context to slander. And what is being called mud, on the writer's part, I see as just a little dust.

It stinks. Answer the figures.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com